Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 6, 2003PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 7, 2001, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board finding that claimant lost her employment as a seasonal parks and recreation aide due to disqualifying misconduct. The record establishes that claimant felt ill on the day in question, but disregarded the employer’s known policy to obtain permission from a supervisor before *816l…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of PatrickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. In re the Claim of SandsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. In re the Claim of Michael A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of WhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. In re the Claim of FerrarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. In re the Claim of MesserAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API