Legal Opinion

Stewart v. South Kansas and Oklahoma RR, Inc.

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided February 3, 1999No. 97-1214-WEBPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum and .Order

WESLEY E. BROWN, Senior District Judge.

This matter is before the court on defendant South Kansas and Oklahoma Railroad’s (“SKOR”) motion for new trial. (Doc. 116). Although plaintiff has requested oral argument, the court finds that oral argument would not assist in deciding the issues presented.

I. Standard Governing Motion for New Trial.

Rule 59(a) permits the court to grant a new trial “for any of the reasons for which new trials have heretofore been granted in actions at law in the courts of the United States.” Motions for new trial are committed to the sound discretion…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. CSX Transportation, Inc. v. EasterwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. OMI Holdings, Inc. v. HowellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
  4. Earwood v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1993
  5. Plains Transport of Kansas, Inc. v. KingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Iowa Pacific Holdings, LLC v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 2012
  2. Jackson v. PotterDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2008
  3. TRUSTID, Inc. v. Next Caller Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2021
  4. United States v. Executive Recycling, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API