Legal Opinion
Walter v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
Decided January 11, 1949No. 6 Div. 718PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The appellant was convicted in the court below for violating the provisions of Sections 8 and 9 of what is commonly referred to as the "Bradford Act." Act No. 298, General Acts 1943, p. 252, Title 26, Sections 383 and 384, Cum. Pocket Part, Code 1940. They are:
"Section 383. Every person shall be free to join or to refrain from joining any labor organization except as otherwise provided in section 391 of this title, and in the exercise of such freedom shall be free from interference by force, coercion or intimidation, or by threats of force or coercion, or by intimidation of or injury to his…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Alabama State Federation of Labor v. McAdorySupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
- Hotel & Restaurant Employees v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
- Baltimore Transit Co. v. FlynnDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1943
- May Department Stores Co. v. BrownDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1945
- In re Suburban Bus Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1946
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Reynolds Metals Company v. ThorneAlabama Court of Appeals · 1961
- Adams v. Republic Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1950