Horne v. State

Blackburn, Presiding Judge.

Following a jury trial, Walter McDonald Horne appeals his convictions for DUI (less safe),1 reckless driving,2 and running a red light.3 He challenges the sufficiency of the evidence on the DUI and reckless driving convictions and contends that the trial court erred (i) in admitting his statement to police that he had previously “gotten into trouble” when taking an aleo-sensor test, and (ii) in considering improper evidence during the sentencing hearing. We hold that the evidence sufficed to sustain the two challenged convictions and that the evidentiary issues were…