Turnbull v. State

Phipps, Presiding Judge.

After a bench trial, Neville Turnbull was convicted of making harassing phone calls1 to his former girlfriend, N. C. He argues on appeal that the evidence was insufficient and that he was deprived of effective assistance of counsel. We affirm.

*7201. When an appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction, “the relevant question is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.”2

The state adduced the…