Space Age Engineering, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MAYER, Judge.
This case is before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment to determine if plaintiff Space Age Engineering, Inc. (Space Age), should be awarded its bid preparation expenses because of defendant’s breach of its duty to fairly and honestly consider its bid.
FACTS
For six years, Lieutenant Colonel Richard Caldwell served as Director of Supply at Sharp Army Depot (SHAD) in California, whose primary mission is to supply eight western states and the Pacific Theater with secondary items and repair parts. After a tour of duty overseas, Caldwell was reassigned to SHAD in…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Caci, Inc.-Federal v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Keco Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
- Torncello v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
- Kalvar Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Raymark Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
- United Enterprise & Associates v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Kinetic Structures Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
- Avtel Services, Inc. v. Unites StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- YRT Services Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.