Sciortino v. Dimon SS Corporation
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MOSCOWITZ, District Judge.
The special issue raised by the separate defense as to whether or not the plaintiff has accepted compensation within the meaning of section 33(b) of the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act (33 US CA § 933(b), was tried before tMs court without a jury.
The sole question for determination is whether or not the third party action specially reserved to injured employees by virtue of section 33(b) of the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act (33 US CA § 933(b), has been saved to tMs plaintiff, or whether the Travelers’ Insurance Company has…
2Cited by10 opinions
- American Stevedores, Inc. v. PorelloSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Grasso v. LorentzenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Toomey v. Waterman SS CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
- Harris v. Louisville N. R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1939
- Johnsen v. American-Hawaiian S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.