Legal Opinion

Sciortino v. Dimon SS Corporation

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided January 9, 1930No. 3858PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOSCOWITZ, District Judge.

The special issue raised by the separate defense as to whether or not the plaintiff has accepted compensation within the meaning of section 33(b) of the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act (33 US CA § 933(b), was tried before tMs court without a jury.

The sole question for determination is whether or not the third party action specially reserved to injured employees by virtue of section 33(b) of the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act (33 US CA § 933(b), has been saved to tMs plaintiff, or whether the Travelers’ Insurance Company has…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. American Stevedores, Inc. v. PorelloSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Grasso v. LorentzenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  3. Toomey v. Waterman SS CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
  4. Harris v. Louisville N. R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  5. Johnsen v. American-Hawaiian S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API