Aloe Creme Laboratories, Inc. v. Texas Pharmacal Co.
District Court, W.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
FISHER, District Judge.
Aloe Creme Laboratories, Inc., hereinafter referred to as Aloe, filed this action under 35 U.S.C. § 146, and 15 U.S.C. § 1071, as a trial de novo, seeking to reverse the decisions of the United States Patent Office, wherein Aloe was denied its claims to the right to the trademark registration of “Alo-Creme”, and was refused the registration, “Alo-Creme After Tan” as a trademark.
The Texas Pharmacal Company, hereinafter referred to as Texas, filed a counterclaim to enjoin the use of “Alo-Creme”, “Alo-Creme After Tan”, and “Aloe Creme” as trademarks, tradenames or parts…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- John Morrell & Co. v. DoyleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938
- A. J. Abramson and Irwin Schwartz, D/B/A Caro Jewelry Company and Caro v. Coro, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
- National Van Lines, Inc. v. Alfred E. Dean and Dean Van Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1961
- General Adjustment Bureau, Inc. v. FuessDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1961
- Huntington National Mattress Co. v. Celanese Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Carling Brewing Company v. Philip Morris, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1967
- Carling Brewing Company v. Philip Morris IncorporatedDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1968
- Sarah Coventry, Inc. v. T. Sardelli & Sons, Inc.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1975