Legal Opinion

Aloe Creme Laboratories, Inc. v. Texas Pharmacal Co.

District Court, W.D. Texas

Decided January 23, 1963No. Civ. A. No. 2789PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FISHER, District Judge.

Aloe Creme Laboratories, Inc., hereinafter referred to as Aloe, filed this action under 35 U.S.C. § 146, and 15 U.S.C. § 1071, as a trial de novo, seeking to reverse the decisions of the United States Patent Office, wherein Aloe was denied its claims to the right to the trademark registration of “Alo-Creme”, and was refused the registration, “Alo-Creme After Tan” as a trademark.

The Texas Pharmacal Company, hereinafter referred to as Texas, filed a counterclaim to enjoin the use of “Alo-Creme”, “Alo-Creme After Tan”, and “Aloe Creme” as trademarks, tradenames or parts…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. John Morrell & Co. v. DoyleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938
  2. A. J. Abramson and Irwin Schwartz, D/B/A Caro Jewelry Company and Caro v. Coro, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
  3. National Van Lines, Inc. v. Alfred E. Dean and Dean Van Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1961
  4. General Adjustment Bureau, Inc. v. FuessDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1961
  5. Huntington National Mattress Co. v. Celanese Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Carling Brewing Company v. Philip Morris, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1967
  2. Carling Brewing Company v. Philip Morris IncorporatedDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1968
  3. Sarah Coventry, Inc. v. T. Sardelli & Sons, Inc.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API