Legal Opinion

Willetts v. Scudder

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1914PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From Multnomah.: George N. Davis, Judge. This is an action for libel by P. L. Willetts against W. T. Scudder. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Department 1.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ramsey

This is an action brought by the plaintiff to recover damages from the defendant for alleged libels published concerning him, by the defendant.

The complaint contains two counts, charging the defendant with the publication of libels, and the libels charged are contained in two letters written by the de*537fendant and addressed to L. S. Miller, president of the Adirondack Maple Company, of Lówville, New York.

The defendant is the president of the Scudder Syrup Company of Chicago. During a part of 1911, and parts of January and February, 1912, the plaintiff was in the employ of the Scudder Syrup…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Upton v. HumeOregon Supreme Court · 1893
  2. State v. WheelerOregon Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Hanson v. RiceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  4. Kotter v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Agee v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1896

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Peck v. Coos Bay Times Publishing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Benson v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Benson v. BirchOregon Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Reiman v. Pacific Development SocietyOregon Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Bradley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API