Legal Opinion

In re Sands

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 15, 1982PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Respondent was admitted to practice in the Second Department on November 1, 1944, under the name Ira Schlusselberg. On December 9, 1981 he entered a plea of guilty in United States District Court for the Southern District of New York to the charge of unlawfully and knowingly using the mails for the purpose of devising a scheme and artifice to defraud and obtain money by means of false and fraudulent pretenses, representations and promises, in violation of sections 1343 and 2 and sections *971341 and 2 of title 18 of the United States Code. Respondent was sentenced to four…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re GibsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  2. In re GritzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  3. In re GundersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. State of Oklahoma, Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. GasawaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  2. In Re a Member of the Bar of the Supreme Court of the State LassenSupreme Court of Delaware · 1996
  3. In re SandsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  4. State of Oklahoma, Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. GasawaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API