Legal Opinion

Stanley v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 12, 1937No. CR 4044PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcHaney, J.

This action was instituted by the State through her prosecuting attorney for the seizure of a certain gambling device in the form of an electric baseball marble slot machine operated in a barber shop in the city of Little Rock. A search warrant was issued and the machine seized. Appellant intervened claiming to be the owner, and that it was operated for. the purpose of amusement and not for gambling. He prayed that it be returned to him.

The facts are stipulated, as follows: “That S. L, Stanley, is the owner of a coin-operated novelty baseball game entitled ‘Home Run.’ That said game is played…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Howell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  2. Steed v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. WileySupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  2. State Ex Rel. Green v. One 5¢ Fifth Inning Base Ball MacHineSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  3. State v. WassickWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. State v. One "Jack and Jill" PinballMissouri Court of Appeals · 1949
  5. Morris L. Johnson v. Robert L. Phinney, Director of Internal Revenue of United States of America for Southern District of TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API