Hunt v. Milligan

The main facts of this case are recitedi in that of Milligan v. Poole, 35 Ind. 64. Buchanan and Milligan were tenants in common, each owning an undivided half of a piece of real estate. Milligan sold! his undivided half to Poole and Magill, hy title-bond requiring him to make a deed to it when the half should he paid for. Poole and Magill paid eight hundred dollars, being a part of the purchase-money.

At this point Buchanan instituted proceedings for partition, making Milligan, Poole and Magill parties.

Commissioners reported the property not divisible, and! it was ordered to be sold. Oldshoe…