Legal Opinion

State v. Toll

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 12, 2018No. A158874PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtEgan, C. J.

*1133*279Defendant, who was convicted after a stipulated facts trial of one count of possession of methamphetamine, ORS 475.894, appeals, assigning error to the denial of a motion to suppress evidence. As ultimately framed by the parties on appeal, the dispositive issue reduces to whether an officer's request for consent to frisk defendant for weapons during a criminal investigatory stop unlawfully extended that stop. We conclude that the officer's request was based on an objectively reasonable perception of "circumstance-specific concerns for [his] safety" and an objectively reasonable…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. BatesOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. RodgersOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. HoldorfOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  5. State v. JimenezOregon Supreme Court · 2015

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. SarmentoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API