Legal Opinion

State v. Sarmento

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 27, 2019No. A160875 (Control), A160876PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOrtega, P. J.

*765In this consolidated appeal, defendant challenges her convictions for unlawful possession of heroin, ORS 475.854, and unlawful possession of methamphetamine, ORS 475.894. In case number 14CR15300, defendant asserts that the trial court erred in denying her motion to suppress evidence obtained during a traffic stop that she contends was unlawfully extended because the "officer-safety" exception to the warrant requirement did not justify the officer's actions.1 We conclude that the trial court erred in denying defendant's motion and, accordingly, reverse and remand.

We review the denial of a…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. BatesOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. RodgersOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. WatsonOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  5. State v. JimenezOregon Supreme Court · 2015

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  2. State v. KeckCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  3. State v. KeckCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API