Legal Opinion

Johnson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 12, 1998No. 97-1502PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant Roman Chad Johnson appeals judgments and sentences imposed upon his admission that he violated his probation in 14 cases, and upon his plea of no contest to a newly charged crime in Case No. 96-1639. Johnson’s appellate counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), indicating that no reversible error is apparent from the face of the record. We agree with this conclusion as to the violation of probation cases, and therefore affirm the judgments and sentences entered therein.

However, our review of the record indicates…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Peavy v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cole v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  2. Marian K. Walker v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  3. Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API