Legal Opinion

Childs v. New England Mutual Life Insurance

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 15, 1937No. 11756PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Hnder the facts contained in this record, the court erred in sustaining the demurrer to the amendment referred to in the statement of facts. While the verdict upon the original suit which proceeded to trial after the demurrer was sustained was a verdict in favor of the two defendants in the suit, nevertheless LeRoy Childs had the right to have the further issue sub-, mitted to the jury as to whether or not the debt had been' fully settled by agreement between the parties, and that for that reason the plaintiff had no right to have the deeds annuled and canceled upon the grounds alleged. And…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lyndon v. Georgia Railway & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  2. Williams v. Seaboard Air-Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1928
  3. Winecoff v. Atlanta Title & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1937

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McDaniel v. Atlanta Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
  2. Webb v. PrinceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
  3. Federal Land Bank v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  4. New England Mutual Life Insurance v. ChildsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API