Legal Opinion

Cleveland Hair Clinic, Inc. v. Puig

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided January 9, 1997No. 96-3976PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge.

After concluding that defendants and their lawyer Michael Tinaglia engaged in sanction-able misconduct in this ongoing litigation, the district judge directed counsel to confer on the size of the attorneys’ fees attributable to the misbehavior. Tinaglia refused to participate; remaining counsel agreed that Cleveland Hair Clinic, the plaintiff, was out of pocket at least $174,121. The district judge declared defendants and Tinaglia jointly and severally liable for this sum, which he ordered paid forthwith while he considered plaintiffs claim that it should receive a…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Quackenbush v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Swint v. Chambers County CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. White v. New Hampshire Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of the United States · 1982

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Robert N. Corley and Vera M. Corley v. Rosewood Care Center, Inc. Of PeoriaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  2. United States v. Lawrence S. BloomCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  3. United States v. Kouri PerezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
  4. American National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  5. HSBC Bank USA v. Kirkland TownsendCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API