Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Joseph Spinola, Margaret R. Caruso and Fay Rossi

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 23, 1967No. 23991PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal from a final declaratory decree in favor of the appellees involves the construction of a provision in an automobile insurance contract relating to hit-and-run vehicles.

On December 21,1963, in Dade County, Florida, appellee Spinola was the driver of a vehicle in which appellees Caruso and Rossi were passengers. Spinola was insured under a contract issued by appellant State Farm. The vehicle was stopped in a line of traffic. Immediately behind him and also stopped was an automobile driven by Mr. Cortez. A third vehicle struck the Cortez automobile which, in turn, rammed the Spinola…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp. v. EisenbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
  2. Cruger v. Allstate Insurance CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  3. Inter-Insurance Exchange of Automobile Club v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Brown v. Progressive Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1971
  2. Motorists Mutual Ins. Co. v. TomanskiOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Clark v. Regent Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Latham v. Mountain States Mutual Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  5. DeMello v. First Insurance Company of Hawaii, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1974

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API