Mann v. Jack Roach Bissonnet, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
COLEMAN, Chief Justice.
This is an appeal from a summary judgment in favor of Jack Roach Bissonnet, Inc. (hereinafter called Jack Roach) and against Horace M. Mann and Marilyn O’Neill Mann. The suit was based on a sworn account and, in the alternative, on quantum meruit. The judgment will be affirmed as to Horace Mann and reversed as to Marilyn O’Neill Mann.
There is evidence that an automobile held in the name of Horace Mann was stolen and recovered in a damaged condition. The car was taken to Jack Roach, who repaired it. During this period of time Horace Mann and Marilyn Mann were separated…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Continental Southern Lines, Inc. v. HillandTexas Supreme Court · 1975
- Davidson v. ClearmanTexas Supreme Court · 1965
- Cathey v. WeaverTexas Supreme Court · 1922
- Wilson v. Browning Arms CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Airborne Freight Corp. v. CRB Marketing, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Pepi Corp. v. Galliford, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007
- State of Minn. Ex Rel. Hove v. DoeseSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- CKB & Associates, Inc. v. Moore McCormack Petroleum, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1991
- Carr v. Austin FortyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Villarreal v. Wells Fargo Brokerage Services, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2010
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.