Grad v. Kaasa
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
314 S.E.2d 755 (1984)
In the Matter of Lucille B. GRAD
v.
Laurin J. KAASA, M.D.
No. 8310SC283.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina.
May 1, 1984.
Jordan, Brown, Price, & Wall, by Henry W. Jones, Jr., Raleigh, for plaintiff.
Patterson, Dilthey, Clay, Cranfill, Sumner & Hartzog by Ronald C. Dilthey, Raleigh, for defendant.
WELLS, Judge.
A motion for summary judgment is proper where "... the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that any party is entitled to judgment as…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Lowe v. BradfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Scarpaci v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Smith v. HefnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Foster v. . HymanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.