Mayer v. Salazar
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Belcher, C. C.
The plaintiff and defendant exchanged horses, and this action was brought to recover damages for the false and fraudulent representations, alleged to have been made by the defendant, as to the soundness of his horse, whereby the plaintiff was induced to make the exchange.
The court below gave judgment for the plaintiff, from, which, and from an order denying a new trial, the defendant appeals.
The court, after finding that the horse of the defendant was unsound at the time of the exchange, further found as follows:—
“2. That defendant, knowing his said horse was unsound, caused the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Litchfield v. HutchinsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gagne v. BertranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Howe v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Browning v. National Capital BankCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1898
- Neilson v. EdwardsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
- Gagne v. BertranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.