Legal Opinion

Aab v. Schonlau

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 9, 1931No. 28,661PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOlsen, J.

Appellant, William Aab, ■ presented a claim in probate coiirt against the estate of Ferdinand Crone, deceased. The probate court dismissed the claim, and appellant appealed to the district court. He duly filed his written complaint in that court. Respondents demurred to the complaint on the ground that it failed to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, the particular gro'und being that it clearly showed on its face that the alleged cause of action was barred by the statute of limitations. The court sustained the demurrer, and this appeal followed.

We are limited here to a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Riddle v. WhitehillSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Clay v. FreemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. McPherson v. SwiftSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
  4. McClung v. CapehartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of CroneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  2. Sklar Oil Corporation v. JamesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API