Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Baker

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided January 3, 1983No. 41,214; CM 440082Published

1DissentCook, Judge

Initially, I must state my disagreement with the contention advanced in the principal opinion that “the President did not simply adopt the so-called ‘Blockburger’ rule to determine whether offenses arising from the same transaction were separate for purposes of punishment in the military justice system.” 14 M.J. 361, 369. In Block-burger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299, 304, 52 S.Ct. 180, 182, 76 L.Ed. 306 (1932), the Supreme Court announced the following rule of statutory construction:

Each of the offenses created requires proof of a different element. The applicable rule is that, where the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Whalen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Albernaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Iannelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API