Legal Opinion
Kolton v. County of Anoka
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 26, 2001No. C1-00-2179PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCHUMACHER, Judge.
Appellant Gloria L. Kolton challenges adverse summary judgment, arguing that the district court erred in ruling she did not establish Minnesota Human Rights Act (MHRA) and equal protection claims as a matter of law. We affirm summary judgment on equal protection but reverse judgment on her statutory claim.
FACTS
Respondent County of Anoka employed appellant as an income maintenance specialist from December 5, 1990 until October 21, 1994, when she resigned due to incapacitating mental illness. Appellant began receiving long term disability (LTD) income through Anoka…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Nordlinger v. HahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- General Electric Co. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Colleen v. Ford v. Schering-Plough Corporation Schering Corporation Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Kolton v. County of AnokaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002