Castelazo & Associates v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Foed, Judge:
The cases listed in schedule “A”, annexed hereto and made a part hereof, consolidated for the purpose of trial, involve the classification of a number of different types of woodworking machines. Said machines were imported with electric motors and were classified as entireties as articles having as an essential feature an electrical *587element or device under the provisions of paragraph 353, Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 86 Treas. Dec. 121, T.D. 52739, and assessed with duty at the rate of 13¾ per centum ad…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Supreme Woodworking Machine v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
- Arnhold Ceramics, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
3Cited by3 opinions
- Castelazo v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
- Miller v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
- Wayne Withrow Tubular Structures Corp. of America v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970