Lamanna v. Proformance Insurance
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wallace
In this personal injury action, we consider the constitutionality of the statutory provision, N.J.S.A. 2B:23-17, which authorizes parties in a civil action to stipulate that a smaller majority of jurors than five-sixths may render the verdict. If we conclude the statute is constitutional, we must also decide if it was harmless error to accept a less than five-sixths jury verdict where the parties failed to comply with Rule 1:8-2 by not agreeing to do so “on the record prior to commencement of deliberations.” At trial, neither party objected to the procedure utilized by the trial court to…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
- New Jersey Sports & Exposition Authority v. McCraneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
- State v. McKnightSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1968
- Sexton ex rel. Kin v. Newark District Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1913
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Riverside Chiropractic Group v. Mercury Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008
- Mazdabrook Commons Homeowners' Ass'n v. KhanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2012
- Investors Sav. v. Waldo JerseyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2011
- State v. MoranNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009
- MIDLAND FUNDING v. GiambancoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2011
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.