Legal Opinion

Lamanna v. Proformance Insurance

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 14, 2005PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wallace

In this personal injury action, we consider the constitutionality of the statutory provision, N.J.S.A. 2B:23-17, which authorizes parties in a civil action to stipulate that a smaller majority of jurors than five-sixths may render the verdict. If we conclude the statute is constitutional, we must also decide if it was harmless error to accept a less than five-sixths jury verdict where the parties failed to comply with Rule 1:8-2 by not agreeing to do so “on the record prior to commencement of deliberations.” At trial, neither party objected to the procedure utilized by the trial court to…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
  3. New Jersey Sports & Exposition Authority v. McCraneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
  4. State v. McKnightSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1968
  5. Sexton ex rel. Kin v. Newark District Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1913

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Riverside Chiropractic Group v. Mercury Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008
  2. Mazdabrook Commons Homeowners' Ass'n v. KhanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2012
  3. Investors Sav. v. Waldo JerseyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2011
  4. State v. MoranNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009
  5. MIDLAND FUNDING v. GiambancoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2011

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API