Legal Opinion

Inabinett v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 14, 1992No. 1910282PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

594 So.2d 214 (1992)

Ex parte State of Alabama.

(Re Don Keith INABINETT and William Alvin Atwell v. STATE).

1910282.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

February 14, 1992.

James H. Evans, Atty. Gen., and Joseph G.L. Marston III, Asst. Atty. Gen., for petitioner.

Thomas M. Haas and N. Ruth Haas and Delano J. Palughi, Mobile, for respondent.

Prior report: Ala.Cr.App., 594 So.2d 202.

2Per curiam

WRIT DENIED.

HORNSBY, C.J., and ALMON, SHORES, ADAMS and INGRAM, JJ., concur.

MADDOX, HOUSTON and STEAGALL, JJ., dissent.

MADDOX, Justice (dissenting).

I would issue the writ to review the State's claim that the totality of the…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Atwell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991
  2. McCostlin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991

4Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  2. Wilsher v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992
  3. Barber v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2005
  4. Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2006
  5. Flowers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2005

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API