Legal Opinion · Dissent

Malcomson Road Utility District v. Newsom

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided June 22, 2005No. 01-00-01163-CVPublished

1DissentEvelyn V. Keyes, Justice

I agree with the majority that Hubenak II requires us to apply the summary judgment standard of review to the trial court’s rulings on each of the statutory requirements for condemnation, including the unable-to-agree requirement. Applying this standard, I agree with the majority that the District conclusively proved that the parties were unable to agree on damages before the filing of suit. I also agree that the District carried its constitutional burden of proving that the taking was for a public use. See Tex. WateR Code Ann. § 54.201(a), (b)(3) (Vernon Supp.2004-2005) (delegating to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Housing Authority v. HigginbothamTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Malcomson Road Utility District v. Newsom, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2005
  3. Wagoner v. City of ArlingtonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
  4. Bradford v. Magnolia Pipe Line Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  5. Jones v. City of MineolaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API