Legal Opinion

Denver & R. G. W. R. v. Industrial Commission

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1928No. 4687PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThurman, C. J.

On March 2, 1927, defendant Emanuel Sterzer was in the employment of the plaintiff, Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad Company, a self-insurer under the Utah Industrial Act (Comp. Laws 1917, §§ 3061-3165). The nature of Ster-zer’s employment was that of helper to a bolt machine operator and on the date mentioned, while in the course of such employment, he met with an accident by which the third, fourth, and fifth digits of his left hand and from one-fourth to one-third of the palmar surface thereof was removed. Sterzer was totally disabled until May 20, 1927, at which time he was pronounced…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Broderick v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Vukelich v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Ætna Life Ins. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Goldman v. TorresTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Bethlehem-Sparrows Point Shipyard, Inc. v. DamasiewiczCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
  3. Denver & Rio Grande Western R. Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Royal Canning Corporation v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API