Legal Opinion
Broderick v. Industrial Commission
Utah Supreme Court
Decided March 17, 1924No. 4090PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFrick, J.
The plaintiff made due and timely application to the Industrial Commission of Utah, hereinafter called Commission, for compensation for an injury sustained by him in July, 1920, in the course of his employment while employed by the defendant Lion Coal Company, which is an employer coming within the provisions of our Workmen’s Compensation Act, commonly known as the Industrial Act. The other defendant, the Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corporation, is the insurance carrier for the coal company.
Compensation was duly awarded plaintiff for all temporary disability and for loss of time, concerning…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- De Zeng Standard Co. v. PresseySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1914
- Moses v. National Union Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1921
- Clark's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1921
- Kerwin v. American Railway Express Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Spring Canyon Coal Co. v. Industrial Commission of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1920
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Spring Canyon Coal Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1929
- Spencer v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1935
- Silver King Coalition Mines Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1937
- Ætna Life Ins. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1924
- Denver & R. G. W. R. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.