Legal Opinion
Little v. Georgia Power Company
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided February 16, 1949No. 16479PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Atkinson, Presiding Justice.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) The objection to the first paragraph of the testimony of R. A. Conaway, quoted in the foregoing statement of facts, upon the grounds that the opinion was based on speculation, and was a conclusion, is without merit. The witness was an electrical engineer of 31 years’ experience, his opinions were based on proven facts, and were admissible under the Code, § 38-1710.
To that portion of the testimony of W. D. Maness, to wit, “The easement on which said . . line is located is 50 feet in width,” objections were interposed on the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Collinsville Granite Co. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Tillman v. BomarSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Bleckley v. WhiteSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
- Town of Pelham v. Pelham Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1908
- Downs v. BrandonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Fuels, Inc. v. RutlandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Humphries v. Georgia Power CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1968
- Tompkins v. WestCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971