Nirenstein v. George A. Horvath, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtNolan, P. J.
The original complaint in this action alleged four causes of action. In substance it alleged that respondent had been employed by Messrs. Myers, Donna and McCormick, as agents for certain stockholders in a corporation known as Monument Mills, Inc., to obtain a purchaser for such stockholders’ shares at a price of $60 a share; that respondent subsequently entered into an agreement with appellant Diamond under which he and Diamond agreed to endeavor jointly to obtain a purchaser of said stock and to divide any brokerage commission received by reason of such sale; that thereafter a sale of the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lahr v. TirrillNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Sweeney v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Keviczky v. LorberNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
- Pattison v. PattisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
- Digelormo v. WeilNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Adam v. CutnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Harte & Co. v. ShayaniNew York Supreme Court · 1962
- Tenzer, Greenblatt, Fallon & Kaplan v. AbbruzzeseNew York Supreme Court · 1968
- Rector v. MelishAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957