Legal Opinion
Gillette v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided September 4, 1916No. 4563PublishedCited by 14 opinions
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of North Dakota; Charles F. Amidon, Judge. - Arthur Gillette was convicted of unlawfully, knowingly, and willfully inducing and enticing a girl to go from one state to another for the purpose of debauchery, and he brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
GARLAND, Circuit Judge.
Gillette was convicted and sentenced to the penitentiary upon an indictment charging the following offense:
“Did unlawfully, knowingly,v and willfully induce and entice, and cause to be persuaded, induced and enticed, a certain girl, to wit, one-, to go from the city of Eargo, in the state of North Dakota, to the city of Moorhead, in the state of Minnesota, by, over, and upon the line of the Fargo-Moorhoad Street Railway Company, for the purpose of debauchery and for an immoral purpose, to wit, that the aforesaid - should engage in the practice of debauchery and illicit…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Weems v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Wiborg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Crawford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Clyatt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Mellor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1947
- Frank Batsell, Also Known as Frank Batsel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1954
- Yoder v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
- Edwards v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
- Rossi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.