Legal Opinion

Frank Batsell, Also Known as Frank Batsel v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided December 6, 1954No. 14935_1PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VOGEL, Circuit Judge.

Appellant Frank Batsell, was convicted by a jury of violating the Mann Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2421. He appeals to this Court, asking that the conviction be set aside or that a new trial be granted.

In view of the fact that a jury found against the appellant, this Court must consider, in its determination of the present appeal, the facts most favorable to sustaining the jury’s verdict. Jensen v. United States, 8 Cir., 1954, 213 F.2d 781; Cwach v. United States, 8 Cir., 1954, 212 F.2d 520.

Two cases were consolidated and tried together and a single record was made of the evidence.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. United States v. Trenton Potteries Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. Cleveland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Mortensen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. United States v. Roy MandujanoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  2. United States v. Jose EspinoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
  3. United States v. Martha Mejia-LozanoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
  4. United States v. Allan Ray Hattaway, Thomas Stimac, Robert George Burroughs, and Marty CurranCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  5. State v. NicholsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1999

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API