Austin v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BURGESS, Justice.
A jury convicted appellant of the murder of his brother and assessed his punishment at twenty years confinement in the Texas Department of Corrections. He brings forth three points of error. The first two both relate to TEX.CODE CRIM.PROC. ANN. art. 37.07(4) (Vernon Supp.1988) or the parole law jury instruction. The final point of error complains of improper jury argument.
In his first point of error, appellant alleges the trial court erred in denying a motion for new trial based upon jury misconduct. The second point alleges the trial court erred in not granting him a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Sneed v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- McCartney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Richardson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Tollett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Arnold v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Buentello v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Hernandez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989
- Gilliam v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1989
- Wheatly v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.