Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Cass

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided August 16, 1984PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHennessey, C.J.

This case presents the question whether a viable fetus is a “person” for purposes of our vehicular homicide statute, G. L. .c. 90, § 24G. At the request of both parties, a judge of the District Court reported the case to the Appeals Court on a statement of agreed facts. Mass. R. Crim. P. 34, 378 Mass. 905 (1979). We transferred the case here on our own motion. We decide that a viable fetus is a person for purposes of G. L. c. 90, § 24G. However, because our decision may not have been foreseeable, we do not apply it to this case or to other homicides occurring before the date of this decision.

T…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. DanforthSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Colautti v. FranklinSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Summerfield v. Superior Court, Maricopa Cty.Arizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Commonwealth v. BoothSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Whitner v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  4. State v. CourchesneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  5. State v. MerrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API