Legal Opinion · Dissent

Gordon v. Matson

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 1, 1969No. 5-4646Published

1Dissent

John A. Fogleman, Justice.

I respectfully dissent because I think that the trial court and the majority have misapplied the summary judgment statute.

Summary judgments are not the favorites of the courts and in determining whether such a judgment should be granted, all pleadings must be liberally construed in favor of the party against whom the judgment would ho granted. White River Limestone Products Co. v. Missouri-Pacific R. Co., 228 Ark. 697, 310 S.W. 2d 3. This extreme remedy should be granted only in the absence of any genuine issue as to any material fact. Wirges v. Hawkins, 238 Ark.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Waterway Terminals Co. v. P. S. Lord Mechanical ContractorsOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Schwartz v. Merola Bros. Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1943
  3. Rosenberg v. SchwartzNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  4. Delaney v. Philhern Realty Holding Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1939
  5. Peairs v. Florida Publishing CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API