Legal Opinion

Pipkin v. Connolly

Montana Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 1975No. 12898PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Daly

delivered the Opinion of the Court..

This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court,. Sweet Grass County, sitting without a jury, holding defendants’ lease terminated upon failure to exercise their right of' first refusal to purchase farmland and further that defendants, were accountable to plaintiffs in unlawful detainer.

Defendants Gerald and Emilie Connolly, husband and wife,, and plaintiffs Derrall and Betty Pipkin, husband and wife, entered into an agricultural lease agreement drawn by defendants’ attorney John R. Glenn, Esq. The lease was for a five, year period beginning March…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Miller v. MeredithMontana Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Garetson v. HesterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  3. Lunke v. EgelandMontana Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Bickford v. KirwinMontana Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rasmussen v. LeeMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Eaton v. FiskNew York Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Holliday Land & Livestock Co. v. PierceMontana Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Marshall v. SummersCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1996
  5. Rasmussen v. LeeMontana Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API