Legal Opinion
Eaton v. Fisk
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 30, 1992PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Maurice E. Strobridge, J.
The plaintiff has moved for summary judgment against the defendants for a declaration that the lease between the parties provides that the defendants must either meet a purchase offer received by the plaintiff or terminate their lease and surrender the leased premises.
The undisputed facts are that the plaintiff’s now deceased husband owned a parcel of land adjoining Sodus Bay in the Village of Sodus Point. After her husband’s death, the plaintiff *267obtained title to the premises. In November 1984 she and her husband entered into a lease of a portion…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Garetson v. HesterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Golden Spread Oil, Inc. v. American Petrofina Co. of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
- Lunke v. EgelandMontana Supreme Court · 1912
- Pipkin v. ConnollyMontana Supreme Court · 1975
3Cited by3 opinions
- Eaton v. FiskAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Graystone Ltd. v. Church Oil Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Marshall v. SummersCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1996