Legal Opinion

Martin v. Bentsen

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 26, 1950No. 12179Published

1Opinion of the Court

BROETER, Justice.

The nature of this appeal is disclosed by the following statement found in appellants’ brief, to which has been added certain additional statements suggested by ap-pellees in their brief:

“This is a suit for rescission and cancellation of a real estate transaction involving an exchange of property and the execution of deed of trust promissory notes. Appellants allege fraud and deceit and fraudulent misrepresentation made to induce them to enter into such exchange and to' execute said notes and that they relied upon such fraudulent misrepresentations in entering into such…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kampmann v. StappenbeckCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  2. Iden v. LippardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  3. Moffitt v. LloydCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  4. Stiles v. StierenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API