Legal Opinion

Dorothy MacKey v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided September 12, 2000No. 99-4022PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALAN E. NORRIS, Circuit Judge.

This appeal comes to us for the second time. In 1998, this court reversed an order of the district court holding that the individual defendants named in the complaint were not acting within the scope of their employment. On remand, the district court entered an order substituting the United States as defendant and dismissing the case pursuant to the Feres doctrine, which bars claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”) for injuries that arise incident to military service. See Feres v. United States, 340 U.S. 135, 71 S.Ct. 153, 95 L.Ed. 152 (1950).

On appeal,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Chappell v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. United States v. MunizSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Hutto v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. United States v. ShearerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Lovely v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  2. Carol Clendening v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
  3. Cummings v. Department of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
  4. Klay v. PanettaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  5. Dickson v. WojcikDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API