Legal Opinion

People v. Clinesmith

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 17, 1959No. Nov. 17, 1959Published

1Opinion of the Court

175 Cal.App.2d Supp. 911 (1959)

THE PEOPLE, Respondent,

v.

LARRY G. CLINESMITH, Appellant.

California Court of Appeals.

Nov. 17, 1959.

Umann & Marks for Appellant.

Roger Arnebergh, City Attorney (Los Angeles), Philip E. Grey, Assistant City Attorney, and William E. Doran, Deputy City Attorney, for Respondent.

DAVID, J.

Following his conviction of violation of Vehicle Code, section 502, with a prior conviction, defendant appeals from the judgment and from the order denying his motion for a new trial. Both are alleged to be erroneous and prejudicial, upon the same three grounds.

[1] (1) The prior…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. In Re PorterfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. McClatchy Newspapers v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. People v. ChapmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Funk v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Ex Parte ClarkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API