Henderson v. Cleveland Ry. Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.
In order to decide this controversy, it is necessary to consider the evidence shown by the record. The automobile was being operated north on East 105th street in the city of Cleveland by the husband of the plaintiff, who was herself seated in the front of the car. The accident occurred at the intersection of Carnegie avenue and East 105th street. The street car tracks run north and south on East 105th street. When the automobile arrived at the intersection, Henderson, the plaintiff’s husband, stopped the automobile, as the traffic light was red for north and south traffic. When the light…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Cleveland Ry. Co. v. GoldmanOhio Supreme Court · 1930
3Cited by3 opinions
- Columbus, Delaware & Marion Electric Co. v. O'DayOhio Supreme Court · 1930
- Inman v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadOhio Court of Appeals · 1958
- Thomas v. Pennsylvania Rd. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1942