Legal Opinion

Iron Molders' Union, Local No. 68 v. Niles-Bement-Pond Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 6, 1918No. 3146PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Ohio; John F. Safer, Judge. Suit in equity by the Niles-Bement-Pond Company against the Niles Tool Works Company, the Iron Molders’ Union, Eocal No. 68,, and others. From an order granting a preliminary injunction, certain of the defendants appeal.

1Per curiam

[1] This case presents a question of jurisdiction of the District Court, dependent entirely upon diversity of citizenship. The bill was filed by appellee Niles-Bement-Pond Company, a New Jersey corporation, as sole plaintiff, against the Niles Tool Works Company, an Ohio corporation, doing business at Hamilton, Ohio (hereinafter called the defendant company or the Tool Works), together with a large number of individual defendants (including two unincorporated Iron Molders’ Union locals, located at Hamilton); the others being officers, representatives, or members "of the respective unions or…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Waterman v. Canal-Louisiana Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. Re Metropolitan Railway ReceivershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. City of Dawson v. Columbia Avenue Saving Fund, Safe Deposit, Title & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. Doctor v. HarringtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  5. Helm v. ZarecorSupreme Court of the United States · 1911

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. West v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1919
  2. City of Toledo v. Toledo Rys. & Light Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1919
  3. Davis v. HenryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1920
  4. Vonnegut Machinery Co. v. Toledo Machine & Tool Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1920
  5. Detroit Tile & Mosaic Co. v. Mason Contractors' Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API