Legal Opinion

United States v. Bell

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided November 24, 1987No. ACMR 8601119PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

De GIULIO, Senior Judge:

A military judge sitting as a general court-martial found appellant guilty, contrary to his pleas, of indecent assault,1 2 3rape and burglary. He was sentenced to a dishonorable discharge, confinement for twenty-five years, and total forfeitures. The convening authority approved the sentence.

Appellant alleges that the evidence was insufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he was guilty of rape, that the *677military judge erred by failing to grant additional administrative credit under Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, 1984, Rule for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. William H. Addington v. Farmer's Elevator Mutual Insurance Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  3. United States v. HartUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  4. United States v. FreemanU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1987
  5. United States v. MyersU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Harvey Lee Green, Jr. v. James B. French, Warden, Central PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
  2. State v. GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  3. State v. HoldenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  4. Harvey Lee Green, Jr. v. James B. French, Warden, Central PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
  5. State v. HoldenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API