Legal Opinion
United States v. Berry Banks
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided December 2, 1966No. 10628PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge:
Berry Banks appeals from his conviction of a Dyer Act offense, complaining that he was denied a speedy trial and that the evidence was insufficient to support the Court’s finding of guilt. We find no merit in either contention.
Until sometime in September, 1964, Banks had been living in the District of Columbia. On September 11 of that year a Chevrolet automobile was stolen in the District of Columbia. The proof showed that on September 20, 1964, Banks was in possession of the stolen vehicle in Southampton County, Virginia. At that time it was in a damaged condition,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Beavers v. HaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- United States v. Carnie Simmons, A/K/A HaroldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- Golden C. Chinn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1955
- United States v. Fiore John Luciano and William DunnCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1965
- Carl Harvey Bistram and Arthur Earl Bistram v. People of the State of Minnesota, County of HennepinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Landman v. RoysterDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1971
- Robert James Pitts v. State of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1968
- State v. LawlessCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1971
- Fabian v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1968
- Stevenson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1968
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.