Legal Opinion

Brent v. Walmart Inc.

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided February 11, 2022No. 6:20-cv-01158Unknown

1Opinion

In the United States District Court for the District of Kansas _____________ No. 20-cv-01158-TC _____________ MICHELLE BRENT, Plaintiff v. WALMART, INC., Defendant _____________ MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Michelle Brent slipped and fell at a Walmart in Topeka, Kansas. She filed this diversity suit for compensatory and punitive damages, alleging that Walmart acted wantonly in failing to maintain a safe envi- ronment. Walmart seeks partial summary judgment on Brent’s punitive damages claim under Kansas law. Docs. 108 & 109. For the following reasons, Walmart’s motion is granted. I A Summary judgment…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Adler v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  4. Smith v. PrintupSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  5. Cerretti v. Flint Hills Rural Electric Cooperative Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API