Legal Opinion

Blake v. Hansen

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 1989No. 860515PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZIMMERMAN, Justice:

Appellants Ernest and Muriel Blake (“the Blakes”) claim on appeal that the trial court erred in granting respondent State Engineer’s motion to dismiss based on section 73-3-15 of the Code, which requires that any appeal of a decision of the State Engineer not prosecuted to final judgment within two years of its issuance be dismissed. Utah Code Ann. § 73-3-15 (1980) (as amended). The Blakes contend that the causes of the delay in proceeding to a timely judgment were beyond their control and that by granting the State Engineer’s motion to dismiss, the trial court denied the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mountain Fuel Supply Co. v. Salt Lake City Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Provo City v. HansenUtah Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Dansie v. LambertUtah Supreme Court · 1975

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jensen v. MorganUtah Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Provo River Water Users' Ass'n v. MorganUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Blake v. HansenUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  4. PROVO RIVER WATER USERS'ASS'N v. MorganUtah Supreme Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API