Legal Opinion

Vittor Et Ux. v. Szymanski

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 22, 1936No. Appeal, 11PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Kephart,

Appellees, Louis Yittor and wife, agreed to exchange their farm property, which was subject to a mortgage of $3,200 and another encumbrance, for a city property belonging to appellants, Michael SzymansM and wife, and $600 cash, $500 of which was paid by note on the execution of the agreement. On default or breach of the contract, the deposit of $500 was to be forfeited. The farm was worth $7,300 and the city property $6,000. The Yittors were to mortgage the town property for $2,500 and with $1,900 from that mortgage together with the $1,300 owed by the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. Diamond Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  2. Goodlett v. HansellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  3. Asia Investment Co. v. LevinWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Brennan v. FordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Haslet v. HasletSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1837

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Levin v. Pittsburgh United Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Baranyai v. Csihas, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County1971
  3. Burns v. Sarkas, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Luzerne County1947
  4. Land v. Cloister Pure-Spring Water Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County1975
  5. Nirdlinger's EstatePennsylvania Orphans' Court, Philadelphia County · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API