Vittor Et Ux. v. Szymanski
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Chief Justice Kephart,
Appellees, Louis Yittor and wife, agreed to exchange their farm property, which was subject to a mortgage of $3,200 and another encumbrance, for a city property belonging to appellants, Michael SzymansM and wife, and $600 cash, $500 of which was paid by note on the execution of the agreement. On default or breach of the contract, the deposit of $500 was to be forfeited. The farm was worth $7,300 and the city property $6,000. The Yittors were to mortgage the town property for $2,500 and with $1,900 from that mortgage together with the $1,300 owed by the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. Diamond Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
- Goodlett v. HansellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
- Asia Investment Co. v. LevinWashington Supreme Court · 1922
- Brennan v. FordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
- Haslet v. HasletSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1837
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Levin v. Pittsburgh United Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Baranyai v. Csihas, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County1971
- Burns v. Sarkas, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Luzerne County1947
- Land v. Cloister Pure-Spring Water Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County1975
- Nirdlinger's EstatePennsylvania Orphans' Court, Philadelphia County · 1937