Burns v. Sarkas
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Luzerne County
1Opinion of the Court
Valentine, P. J.,
— This is a motion to continue a preliminary injunction. The controlling facts, which give rise to the controversy, are set forth in written documents between the parties. Plaintiff contracted to purchase from defendant, Sarkas, the business operated by him, together with the equipment contained in a diner located at 44 East Broad Street, Hazleton, and to lease the premises and building in which the business was conducted. Plaintiff paid to defendant $8,000 for the business, and received a bill of sale for the same. Simultaneously therewith, the parties executed a written…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. Diamond Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
- McClintock & Irvine Co. v. Ætna Explosives Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
- Siegel, Cooper & Co. v. ColbyIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
- DePauw University v. United Electric Coal CompaniesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1939
- Conservative Realty Co. v. St. Louis Brewing Ass'nMissouri Court of Appeals · 1908
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.